court adjourns case till May 2
By Ola Ajayi
TRIAL of a former governor of Oyo State, Otunba Adebayo Alao-Akala and two others over alleged N11.5 billion fraud was yesterday, stalled following the absence of prosecution witness who was to give evidence in support of the 11-count charge preferred against the accused by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.
Justice Olalekan Owolabi of the Oyo State High Court, sitting in Iyaganku, Ibadan, Oyo State, granted the EFCC’s request after its counsel, Dr. Ben Ubi, told the court that the second witness, Mr Abdulrasheed Bawa, who is also the current head operations in the commission’s Port Harcourt zonal office, was unable to make it to the court.
The former governor is standing trial alongside the commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Matters during his tenure, Hosea Agboola, and an Ibadan-based businessman, Femi Babalola.
The charge against them borders on conspiracy, awarding a contract without budgetary provision, obtaining by false pretence, acquiring property with money derived from an illegal act and concealing the ownership of such property, among others.
Among the offences, according to the information on the court papers, was a road contract worth N8.5bn, which Alao-Akala awarded between 2007 and 2009 to Pentagon Engineering Services, Babalola’s company, allegedly without budgetary provision.
The said contract was executed on behalf of the 33 local governments in the state.
Also in the charge is the allegation that the former governor ordered the supply of drilling machines on behalf of the 33 local governments in the state to the tune of N3.5 billion.
Apart from the allegation of conspiring with Agboola to withdraw N2.9bn from the Oyo State Local Government Joint Account, the anti-graft agency is equally prosecuting the former governor for allegedly illegally acquiring some property on Old Bodija road, off Rotimi Williams’ road, when he was in office.
The offences were said to contravene Section 22 (4) of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act and Section 1 (18) of the Advanced Fee Fraud Act.
The presiding judge then adjourned the matter to May 2, 2019, for the continuation of the trial as he ordered the prosecution to make its witnesses available at the next date.